View Mobile Site
  • Bookmark and Share

Header

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

Lawsuit may be filed after Hindu temple near Lake Lanier denied

Forsyth commissioners voted unanimously against conditional use permit

 
POSTED: February 16, 2017 8:00 p.m.
Isabel Hughes/

Residents applaud as commissioners unanimously vote to deny a proposed Hindu temple in a neighborhood near Lake Lanier Thursday evening.

View Larger

CUMMING – Though the Forsyth County Board of Commissioners unanimously denied a conditional use permit, or CUP, for a proposed Hindu temple in the Shady Shores and Bald Ridge on Lanier communities in Cumming Thursday evening, the fight may not be over yet.

The applicant, Evansville, Indiana, gastroenterologist Sumaltha Satoor, said she intends to file suit in court against the BOC’s decision, citing the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, or RLUIPA, which was passed in 2000.

RLUPIA was passed to “protect individuals, houses of worship, and other religious institutions from discrimination in zoning and landmarking laws,” according to the Department of Justice.

District 5 Commissioner Laura Semanson, whose district the application falls in, stressed the decision was not made based on Satoor’s religion; rather, she said the CUP is “inappropriate and inconsistent with other general and special considerations in the unified development code.”

“There has been much speculation as to the motivations of the applicant and those who expressed opposition, but it’s important to set aside the unknown and the speculative and base our decision on the facts,” she said. “For a number of reasons, not limited to the unanimous recommendation of denial by our planning commission, the existence of community covenants, the scope and scale of the proposal with respect to the surrounding impact, I move to deny [the application] for the following reasons:

“This intensive use is inconsistent with the use and zoning of nearby properties. [It] will significantly burden adjoining and nearby properties. [It] will significantly burden the value of adjoining and nearby properties. [It] is prohibited by applicable covenants and [it] will burden traffic and roadway safety. Lastly, the planning commission unanimously recommended denial.”

Despite Semanson’s reasons, Stuart Teague, Satoor’s attorney, said he and Satoor will move forward in court.

“I think there are grounds for a [suit,]” he said. “The covenants – I don’t think they’ve taken a close look at them or that they’re very well drafted so I’m not really worried about those. The issue of religious use basically neutralizes the issue of zoning. So I think there’s really no reason for denial of this.”

Satoor first filed the CUP application in June 2016 to build on land she currently owns. It proposed an 11,200-square-foot temple, along with a 4,128-square-foot priest residence and 109 parking spaces be erected on about 8 acres at 5325 Pilgrim Point Road.

A CUP allows use of a property in a way not permitted by current zoning laws without applying for a rezoning.

The application has garnered attention from the get-go, with more than 200 residents attending a public participation meeting at the residence July 29.

Since then, opponents have worn red to county meetings, including Thursday’s BOC meeting, to visually show how many are opposed.

At least 200 attended the Jan. 31 planning commission public hearing, where the planning board voted unanimously to deny the application.

Though residents, the Forsyth County planning board and Semanson have insisted the CUP’s denial has nothing to do with Satoor’s religion, Satoor previously told the Forsyth County News she felt the opposition was, in fact, based in religious discrimination.

“When we looked at the comparable properties around, it looked like other religious properties existed in the neighborhoods and our property should be treated just like that,” Satoor said. “We are a peacefully existing religion, and that is what the United States is all about — peaceful coexistence of all races and religions.

“They shouldn’t be discriminating against one particular religion and that’s what I felt like happened. They did not say it, but I [feel it.]”
Paula Chambers, a Bald Ridge resident for more than 30 years, has followed the application from day one and said she was pleased with the BOC’s decision.

“I feel very confident and positive by the rulings the Board of Commissioners made tonight,” she said. “Obviously I feel like they made the right decision, [but] it makes me sad that Dr. Satoor is pursuing this on the religious grounds. This is so not what that’s about.

“This is about our way of life and the covenants and I feel like we won tonight.”

COMMENTS

  • Bookmark and Share

4 comments
verita51: February 17, 2017 3:40 p.m.

Please, please, please, please, please be more careful in choosing your words. The Hindu Temple was NOT denied just its proposed location. Why people in the media try to stir up trouble is beyond me. The media used to be the watchdog of the people. Now you can't trust a thing they report.The claim that "other religious properties existed in the neighborhoods..." was addressed in that all of the churches her lawyer brought to light were in existence (some since the 1800s) BEFORE any houses were constructed in the area. Our roads are narrow. There are no sidewalks. We are on a private water system and our covenants are in place to protect our properties from just such an assault. She can believe however she chooses. That is her right as an American citizen. That is the very principal our country was founded upon. But she does not have the right to impact 1,000+ homeowners with her choice of location. I do so wish the media would not use touchy wording such as "Lawsuit may be filed after Hindu temple near Lake Lanier denied". The temple was not denied just its proposed location. I think it is very selfish of this woman to persist when she knows how many people are against it. She knows the many, many, many times the opposition has expressed that it has nothing to do with religion. Yet the truth once again falls on deaf ears.


thunter: February 20, 2017 9:29 a.m.

I have a few questions I would like to ask Dr.Satoor. 1. Is there a large place of worship in the sub-division, or on the land where you currently live in Indiana? 2.If not do you have future plans to attempt to get one opened there or support any other religious organization who might? And third, if not for Heavens sake why not?


canoe: February 22, 2017 12:02 a.m.

I agree with veritas1 the location is wrong and no doubt veritas (truth) is key here. The golden rule seems to have now become anachronistic. Not sure if there is a similar doctrine in the Hindu religion(s), but it should be obvious such a large center would be a burden and out of place there. May the good Dr. seek to do no harm to her neighbors and come to know the living personification of veritas. Seek Him +++


buddyp: February 22, 2017 10:31 a.m.

Two key words catch my eyes...Dept of Justice and RLUPIA....and the fact they are Middle Eastern also plays into this issue. Forsyth has a large Hindu population and they have existing Temples in place ( that neighbors though would not be there) in our county as we discuss this topic. With the way Federal Judges are implementing their ruling of laws now,it might backfire, have to wait and see.



Login to post a comment

http://www.forsythnews.com/ encourages readers to interact with one another. We will not edit your comments, but we reserve the right to delete any inappropriate responses.

To report offensive or inappropriate comments, contact our editor.

These comments are from readers of http://www.forsythnews.com/ and do not necessarily represent the views of The Newspaper or Morris Multimedia.
You must be logged in to post comments. Login ›

 


Contents of this site are © Copyright 2017 Forsyth News, Cumming, GA. All rights reserved. Privacy policy and Terms of service

Powered by
Morris Technology
Please wait ...