At a glance
The free eight-week UNG Great Decisions lecture series runs 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. Thursdays from Jan. 17-March 7 in Room 162 of the University Center | GA 400, which is off Pilgrim Mill Road near Ga. 400 at Exit 16.
• Thursday: “Iran,” presented by Dr. Christopher Jespersen, dean of the College of Arts & Letters.
• Jan. 24: “Myanmar and Southeast Asia,” presented by Dr. Richard Byers, associate professor, Department of History, Anthropology, Religion and Philosophy.
• Jan. 31: “NATO,” presented by Dr. Craig Greathouse, associate professor, Department of International Affairs and Political Science.
• Feb. 7: “Threat Assessment,” presented by Dr. Dlynn Armstrong-Williams, head of the Department of International Affairs and Political Science.
• Feb. 14: “China in Africa,” presented by Dr. Sungshin Kim, assistant professor, Department of History, Anthropology, Religion, and Philosophy.
• Feb. 21: “Egypt,” presented by Dr. Victoria Hightower, assistant professor, Department of History, Anthropology, Religion, and Philosophy.
• Feb. 28: “Future of the Euro,” presented by Dr. Lance Bardsley, assistant professor, Department of International Affairs and Political Science.
• March 7: “Humanitarian Intervention,” presented by Dr. Randy Parish Jr., professor, Department of International Affairs and Political Science.
An annual discussion program produced by the Foreign Policy Association and presented by the University of North Georgia is kicking off an eight-week series this week to explore the international economy and world politics.
The Great Decisions lecture series, which is in its fourth year, will run each Monday and Thursday through March 7 at the university’s Cumming and Gainesville campuses.
The Cumming lectures are set for Thursdays in Room 162 of the University Center | GA 400, which is off Pilgrim Mill Road near Ga. 400 at Exit 16.
Each lecture will run from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m., with the last hour held open for questions and discussion.
Those who attend will have the opportunity to explore topics ranging from Middle East realignment to energy geopolitics, all led by the university’s faculty members.
“It really gives us an opportunity for us to go out into the community with professors who have a background in those particular areas so they can lead a discussion with community members and those interested, and examine some of the deeper questions and consequences of the rise of other powers in the world, increasing threats to national security and our relation with international partners,” said Dlynn Armstrong-Williams, head of the university’s department of international affairs and political science.
Armstrong-Williams, whose background is in international security, will hold her lecture, “Threat Assessment,” on Feb. 4 and Feb. 7.
“I think that one of the things that has happened in the media is the huge politicization of foreign policy questions — all questions,” she said. “What happens then is it’s approached from more of a confrontational viewpoint as opposed to a consensus-building viewpoint.
“As professors, we try to explain what’s happening, not necessarily politicize what’s happening. I think that for many people, they’re exposed mostly to the politicization of those issues and they see everything as punditry as opposed to an intellectual, analytical examination of what could be causing particular actions by both the United States and others in the new world system.”
Each year, the series’ editorial board selects eight new topics based on the most pressing global issues and regions.
All eight will be featured in an accompanying briefing book and in the Great Decisions Television Series airing nationally on Public Broadcasting Station channels.
“It’s pulled historians and political scientists who have that as part of the focus of their study to have a broader, hopefully very informed discussions about those issues,” Armstrong-Williams said.
“Our hope is through the Great Decisions series we can have kind of a space where individuals can ask questions in an environment where the focus is truly on the issue, not on how the issue can be used.”
Last year’s sessions each drew 50 to 75 people.