By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great local journalism.
Rezoning process changes sent to BOC
Planning board recommends approval
Placeholder Image
Forsyth County News

Other business

Also during its meeting Tuesday night, Forsyth County’s planning board:

• Recommended approval of a conditional use permit for POD Z Partners for a senior housing project with independent and assisted living. The 8.8-acre site at James Burgess Road and Ruth Lane will include 140 units.

• Suggested approval to rezone about 2 acres from commercial to Res-4 to allow for seven more lots in the Sentinel Chase subdivision off of Peachtree Parkway.  

The board suggested a condition that the developer, KM Homes, must create an amenity area, as requested by residents. The vote was 3-1, with Alan Neal opposed and Joe Moses absent.

• Agreed with a request by The Ryland Group to rezone about 13.6 acres from neighborhood shopping and restricted industrial to Res-4 for 41 homes to be added to the existing subdivision, Stone View at Stoney Pointe.

An amenity area was proposed in conjunction with the next phase of the neighborhood. The vote was 4-0, with Moses absent.

Note: All votes were 5-0, unless otherwise noted.

— Alyssa LaRenzie

The Forsyth County planning board recommended approval of changes to the rezoning process as proposed by staff, though other suggestions were floated during its meeting Tuesday night.

The board voted 4-1, with member Joe Moses opposed, to send the unified development code changes to the county commission without revisions.

The commission is slated to hold the second public hearing on April 4 and consider approval of the code changes, which came about as part of the “user friendly initiative.”

The initiative began in 2011 with a stakeholder group discussing ideas on how to streamline the process and reboot development.

The rezoning changes reduce the application process from two parts, a preliminary review and a board submittal, to one all-purpose application, said Vanessa Bernstein, senior long-range planner.

The proposal also reduces the reporting requirements for public participation meetings and lowers the number of days to post a sign from 21 to 15.

In addition, it allows more discretion for how major changes to an application will affect its timeline, Bernstein said.

“The changes are to streamline the process while minimizing the reduction or elimination of standards,” she said.

Moses suggested three revisions to the rezoning code proposal: adding the name of an owner or officer when a corporation is the applicant; including all concerns from a public participation meeting rather than a summary; and a requirement to maintain a posted sign until the public participation process has been completed.

His motion to add those changes did not receive any support from the other members.

During the public hearing, attorney Ethan Underwood, who often represents applicants for rezonings, spoke in favor of the proposal.

The way the existing code is written, Underwood said, the window in the process to hold a public participation meeting is typically about two days.

The changes would provide three weeks for the applicant to hold that meeting and then address the public’s concerns before the proposal reaches the planning board at a work session, he said.

Also in approving the code changes for rezoning, the board’s vote was in favor of adding a provision that would grandfather in the smaller lot size requirements for Residential-3 zonings submitted prior to Nov. 1, 2007, when the standards changed.